Abstract
Purpose: Care management for high-cost patients is only effective if their costs persist year-to-year. Little is known about the relative persistence of high-cost patients receiving mental health care compared to random chance or a national sample of the general population.
Methods: We identified Medicaid patients receiving mental health care that were in the top 20%, 10%, and 5% of costs based on claims that remained high-cost two and three years. The likelihood of two-year persistence for those in the top 10% was compared to random chance and a national sample using a 2x2 contingency table.
Results: The high-cost population demonstrated two-year persistence of 64% for top 20%, 56% for top 10%, 46% for top 5%. Compared to 10% persistence from random chance and 43% persistence from a national sample, the sample persistence was significantly greater.
Conclusions: High-cost Medicaid patients with mental health diagnoses demonstrate greater high-cost persistence than the general population.
References
Please see the article for references.
Publisher
Journal of Healthcare Finance is published by Journal of Healthcare Finance (a registered LLC).
Editors-in-Chief
-
Dunc Williams, PhD (Medical University of South Carolina)
-
Aaron Winn, PhD (Medical College of Wisconsin)
Content Provider and Permissions Holder
Copyright © 2025 Journal of Healthcare Finance. All rights reserved.
For permissions, reproduction, or licensing requests, please contact:
[email protected]