Quantifying the Economic Impact of Poor Quality (Hemolyzed) Blood Samples from the Emergency Department

Abstract

Hemolysis is the most common source of error in laboratory samples; it can potentially affect the results of several frequently ordered lab tests, and is responsible for almost 60% of rejected samples,1,2 requiring re-collection.

One study in the literature identified hemolysis as “financially important”,5 and another calculated the possible avoidable expenditure resulting from hemolysis to be as high as 22.8% of the total cost of serum sample collection.

In collaboration with the BD Solutions Group, we developed a model to determine the costs of hemolyzed samples using the average hemolysis rate in the ED of 10%.  The potential cost savings were then calculated if the rate of hemolysis in the ED could be reduced from 10% to 2%.

A substantial portion of time must be allocated to manage a hemolyzed sample.  The actual testing (or re-testing) in the laboratory (including reagents and labor) must be incorporated in any costs associated with hemolyzed samples. 

By reducing hemolysis in the ED to 2%, a comparable hospital could realize an annual savings of approximately $144,000, which includes both materials and labor.

PDF

References

See the article for references.

Publisher
Journal of Healthcare Finance is published by Journal of Healthcare Finance (a registered LLC).

Editors-in-Chief

  • Dunc Williams, PhD (Medical University of South Carolina)

  • Aaron Winn, PhD (Medical College of Wisconsin)

Content Provider and Permissions Holder
Copyright © 2025 Journal of Healthcare Finance. All rights reserved.

For permissions, reproduction, or licensing requests, please contact:
[email protected]